Welcome to DiSC 2003
SIGMOD 2002
PODS 2002
 SIGMOD RECORD 2002
 ADBIS 2002
CIKM 2002
CoopIS 2002
 EDBT 2002
 ER 2002
Data Engineering Bul
DEXA_EC-WEB 2002
DMKD 2002
 DPDJ 2002
HYPERTEXT 2002
ICDE 2002
ICDM 2002
JCDL 2002
KDD 2002
 KDD_EXPLORATIONS 20
KRDB 2002
MDM 2002
MIS 2002
RIDE 2002
SBBD 2002
 SIGIR 2002
 SIGIR FORUM 2002
SSDBM 2002
TODS 2002
TIME 2002
<<< = TIME'02 papers>>>
VLDB 2002
VLDBJ 2002

Index Based Processing of Semi-Restrictive Temporal Joins


Donghui Zhang and Vassilis J. Tsotras

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to Time Management in Databases


Abstract

Temporal joins are important but very costly operations. While a temporal join can involve the whole time (and/or key) domain, we consider the more general case where the join is defined by some time-key rectangle from the whole space (i.e., when the user is interested in joining portions of the-usually large-temporal data). In the most restrictive join, objects (within this rectangle) are joined together based on key equality and interval intersection. This paper concentrates on semi-restrictive joins, i.e., when either the key equality (equi-join) or the interval intersection (time-join) predicates are used. Given the large relations created by the ever increasing time dimension, we assume that each temporal relation is indexed and examine efficient ways to process semi-restrictive temporal joins. Utilizing an index is helpful since it directs the join towards the objects that are within the time-key rectangle. A straightforward approach is to perform an unsynchronized join. An index selection query on each relation identifies all objects within the time-key rectangle which are then joined. Although simple, this approach ignores the data distribution in the other relation. Instead, in a synchronized join, both indices are concurrently traversed as the join is computed. Synchronized semi-restrictive join algorithms can be performed utilizing traditional indices like B+-trees or R-trees. The drawback of this approach is that traditional indices do not achieve good temporal data clustering. Better clustering is achieved by temporal indices through record copying. Nevertheless, record copies can greatly affect the correctness and effectiveness of join performance.


DiSC'03 © 2003 Association for Computing Machinery