![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Return to Workflow Current workflow management systems, whether they are commercial products or research prototypes, do not provide adequate means for inter-workflow coordination as concurrently executing workflows are considered completely independent. As this simplified view is not sufficient for many real-world application scenarios, interaction expressions and graphs have been developed as a simple yet powerful formalism for the specification and implementation of synchronization conditions in general and inter-workflow dependencies in particular.In this paper,different coordination protocols as well as an accompanying subscription protocol are introduced as a means to actually employ interaction expressions to efficiently synchronize concurrent workflows. ![]() DiSC'03 © 2003 Association for Computing Machinery |