![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Return to Posters In this poster, we will present the results of efforts we have undertaken to conduct evaluations of a QA system in a real world environment and to understand the nature of the dimensions on which users evaluate QA systems when given full reign to comment on whatever dimensions they deem important. @inproceedings{1009094, author = {Elizabeth D. Liddy and Anne R. Diekema and Ozgur Yilmazel}, title = {Context-based question-answering evaluation}, booktitle = {SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th annual international conference on Research and development in information retrieval}, year = {2004}, isbn = {1-58113-881-4}, pages = {508--509}, location = {Sheffield, United Kingdom}, doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009094}, publisher = {ACM Press}, } ![]() ©2005 Association for Computing Machinery |