![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Return to Session VIIIb: Image retrieval, users and usability This paper reports on and discusses a set of user experiments using the TREC 2003 Web interactive track protocol. The focus is on comparing humans and machine algorithms in terms of performance in a topic distillation task. We also investigated the effect of the search results layout in supporting the users' effort.We have demonstrated that machines can perform nearly as well as people on the topic distillation task. Given a system tailored to the task there is significant performance improvement and finally, given a presentation that supports the task, there is strong user satisfaction. @inproceedings{1009058, author = {Mingfang Wu and Gheorghe Muresan and Alistair McLean and Muh-Chyun (Morris) Tang and Ross Wilkinson and Yuelin Li and Hyuk-Jin Lee and Nichloas J. Belkin}, title = {Human versus machine in the topic distillation task}, booktitle = {SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th annual international conference on Research and development in information retrieval}, year = {2004}, isbn = {1-58113-881-4}, pages = {385--392}, location = {Sheffield, United Kingdom}, doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008992.1009058}, publisher = {ACM Press}, } ![]() ©2005 Association for Computing Machinery |