![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Note: Links lead to the DBLP on the Web. Ian Ruthven Lei Wen , Ian Ruthven, Pia Borlund : The Effects on Topic Familiarity on Online Search Behaviour and Use of Relevance Criteria. ECIR 2006 : 456-459 Ryen W. White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 42 (1): 166-190 (2006) Fabio Crestani , Ian Ruthven: Context: Nature, Impact, and Role - 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005, Glasgow, UK, June 4-8, 2005, Proceedings Springer 2005 Alex Bailey , Ian Ruthven, Leif Azzopardi : Evaluating User Studies in Information Access. CoLIS 2005 : 251-251 Ryen W. White , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. SIGIR 2005 : 35-42 Ryen W. White , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose , C. J. van Rijsbergen : Evaluating implicit feedback models using searcher simulations. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 23 (3): 325-361 (2005) Ryen W. White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access. JASIST 56 (10): 1113-1125 (2005) Anastasios Tombros , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : How users assess Web pages for information seeking. JASIST 56 (4): 327-344 (2005) Ryen W. White , Joemon M. Jose , C. J. van Rijsbergen , Ian Ruthven: A Simulated Study of Implicit Feedback Models. ECIR 2004 : 311-326 David J. Bell , Ian Ruthven: Searcher's Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching. ECIR 2004 : 57-71 Ryen White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: An approach for implicitly detecting information needs. CIKM 2003 : 504-507 Anastasios Tombros , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: Clustering Top-Ranking Sentences for Information Access. ECDL 2003 : 523-528 Anastasios Tombros , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven, Ryen W. White : Clustering the Information Space Using Top-Ranking Sentences: A Study of User Interaction. INTERACT 2003 Ian Ruthven: Re-examining the potential effectiveness of interactive query expansion. SIGIR 2003 : 213-220 Anastasios Tombros , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : Searchers' criteria For assessing web pages. SIGIR 2003 : 385-386 Ryen W. White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: Using Top-Ranking Sentences for Web Search Result Presentation. WWW (Posters) 2003 Ryen White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching. Inf. Process. Manage. 39 (5): 707-733 (2003) Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas , C. J. van Rijsbergen : Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback. JASIST 54 (6): 529-549 (2003) Ian Ruthven: On the Use of Explanations as Mediating Device for Relevance Feedback. ECDL 2002 : 338-345 Thomas Rölleke , Mounia Lalmas , Gabriella Kazai , Ian Ruthven, Stefan Quicker : The Accessibility Dimension for Structured Document Retrieval. ECIR 2002 : 284-302 Craig J. A. McEwan , Iadh Ounis , Ian Ruthven: Building Bilingual Dictionaries from Parallel Web Documents. ECIR 2002 : 303-323 Ryen White , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : The Use of Implicit Evidence for Relevance Feedback in Web Retrieval. ECIR 2002 : 93-109 Ryen White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: A system using implicit feedback and top ranking sentences to help users find relevant web documents. SIGIR 2002 : 446 Ryen White , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes. SIGIR 2002 : 57-64 Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas : Using Dempster-Shafer's Theory of Evidence to Combine Aspects of Information Use. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 19 (3): 267-301 (2002) Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas , C. J. van Rijsbergen : Combining and selecting characteristics of information use. JASIST 53 (5): 378-396 (2002) Ryen White , Ian Ruthven, Joemon M. Jose : Web Document Summarisation: A Task-oriented Evaluation. DEXA Workshop 2001 : 951-955 Ian Ruthven, C. J. van Rijsbergen , Mounia Lalmas : Empirical Investigations on Query Modification Using Abductive Explanations. SIGIR 2001 : 181-189 Ryen White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: Query-Based Web Page Summarisation: A Task-Oriented Evaluation. SIGIR 2001 : 412-413 Ryen White , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven: Comparing Explicit and Implicit Feedback Techniques for Web Retrieval: TREC-10 Interactive Track Report. TREC 2001 Neill Alexander , Craig Brown , Joemon M. Jose , Ian Ruthven, Anastasios Tombros : Question Answering, Relevance Feedback and Summarisation: TREC-9 Interactive Track Report. TREC 2000 Ian Ruthven: Incorporating Aspects of Information Use into Relevance Feedback. Inf. Retr. 2 (1): 79-84 (2000) Stephen W. Draper , Mark D. Dunlop , Ian Ruthven, C. J. van Rijsbergen : Proceedings of Mira 99: Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, April 14-16, 1999 BCS 1999 Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas : Selective Relevance Feedback Using Term Characteristics. CoLIS 1999 Mounia Lalmas , Ian Ruthven: A Framework for Investigating the Interaction in Information Retrieval. EJC 1999 : 222-239 Mounia Lalmas , Ian Ruthven: A Model for Structured Document Retrieval: Empirical Investigations. HIM 1997 : 53-66 Mark Sanderson , Ian Ruthven: Report on the Glasgow IR group (glair4) submission. TREC 1996 Ian Ruthven: Proceedings of the Final WorkShop on Multimedia Information Retrieval (MIRO'95), Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 18-20 September 1995 BCS 1995 Mark D. Dunlop , Ian Ruthven: An Analysis of the Use of Graphics for Information Retrieval. MIRO 1995 Fabio Crestani , Ian Ruthven, Mark Sanderson , C. J. van Rijsbergen : The Troubles with Using a Logical Model of IR on a Large Collection of Documents. TREC 1995 1 [ 10 ] 2 [ 37 ] 3 [ 37 ] 4 [ 31 ] 5 [ 40 ] 6 [ 10 ] 7 [ 1 ] [ 38 ] 8 [ 8 ] 9 [ 2 ] [ 8 ] 10 [ 10 ] [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ 14 ] [ 17 ] [ 18 ] [ 19 ] [ 24 ] [ 25 ] [ 26 ] [ 28 ] [ 29 ] [ 30 ] [ 32 ] [ 33 ] [ 34 ] [ 35 ] [ 36 ] [ 39 ] 11 [ 21 ] 12 [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 16 ] [ 21 ] [ 23 ] 13 [ 20 ] 14 [ 20 ] 15 [ 21 ] 16 [ 1 ] [ 8 ] [ 13 ] [ 15 ] [ 23 ] [ 32 ] [ 35 ] 17 [ 21 ] 18 [ 1 ] [ 4 ] 19 [ 10 ] [ 26 ] [ 28 ] [ 29 ] [ 33 ] 20 [ 40 ] 21 [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ 14 ] [ 17 ] [ 18 ] [ 19 ] [ 24 ] [ 25 ] [ 28 ] [ 30 ] [ 32 ] [ 34 ] [ 35 ] [ 36 ] [ 39 ] ![]() ©2006 Association for Computing Machinery |