Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2005
PODS 2005
SIGMOD-RECOR
CIDR 2005
CIKM 2005
COMAD 2005
CVDB 2005
DaMoN 2005
Data Enginee
DEBS05
DMSN 2005
DOLAP 2005
GIR 2005
GIS 2005
Hypertext 20
ICDE 2005
ICDM 2005
IHIS 2005
IQIS 2005
JCDL 2005
KRAS 2005
MDM 2005
MIR 2005
MobiDE 2005
P2PIR 2005
RIDE 2005
SBBD 2005
SIGIR 2005
SIGIR-FORUM
SIGKDD 2005
SIGKDD-EXP
SSDBM 2005
TIME 2005
TKDE 2005
<<< = TKDE'05 Pape>>>
TODS 2005
VLDB 2005
VLDBJ 2005
WebDB 2005
WIDM 2005

A new dependency and correlation analysis for features


Guangzhi Qu, Salim Hariri, and Mazin S. Yousif

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to September 2005, Volume 17, Issue 9


Abstract

The quality of the data being analyzed is a critical factor that affects the accuracy of data mining algorithms. There are two important aspects of the data quality, one is relevance and the other is data redundancy. The inclusion of irrelevant and redundant features in the data mining model results in poor predictions and high computational overhead. This paper presents an efficient method concerning both the relevance of the features and the pairwise features correlation in order to improve the prediction and accuracy of our data mining algorithm. We introduce a new feature correlation metric Q/sub Y/(X/sub i/,X/sub j/) and feature subset merit measure e(S) to quantify the relevance and the correlation among features with respect to a desired data mining task (e.g., detection of an abnormal behavior in a network service due to network attacks). Our approach takes into consideration not only the dependency among the features, but also their dependency with respect to a given data mining task. Our analysis shows that the correlation relationship among features depends on the decision task and, thus, they display different behaviors as we change the decision task. We applied our data mining approach to network security and validated it using the DARPA KDD99 benchmark data set. Our results show that, using the new decision dependent correlation metric, we can efficiently detect rare network attacks such as User to Root (U2R) and Remote to Local (R2L) attacks. The best reported detection rates for U2R and R2L on the KDD99 data sets were 13.2 percent and 8.4 percent with 0.5 percent false alarm, respectively. For U2R attacks, our approach can achieve a 92.5 percent detection rate with a false alarm of 0.7587 percent. For R2L attacks, our approach can achieve a 92.47 percent detection rate with a false alarm of 8.35 percent.


©2006 Association for Computing Machinery