Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2005
PODS 2005
SIGMOD-RECOR
CIDR 2005
CIKM 2005
COMAD 2005
CVDB 2005
DaMoN 2005
Data Enginee
DEBS05
DMSN 2005
DOLAP 2005
GIR 2005
GIS 2005
Hypertext 20
ICDE 2005
ICDM 2005
IHIS 2005
IQIS 2005
<<< = IQIS'05 Pape>>>
JCDL 2005
KRAS 2005
MDM 2005
MIR 2005
MobiDE 2005
P2PIR 2005
RIDE 2005
SBBD 2005
SIGIR 2005
SIGIR-FORUM
SIGKDD 2005
SIGKDD-EXP
SSDBM 2005
TIME 2005
TKDE 2005
TODS 2005
VLDB 2005
VLDBJ 2005
WebDB 2005
WIDM 2005

IQIS 2005 Keynote Speech 2 Methods and Analyses for Determing Quality


William E. Winkler

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to Invited Keynote 2: William E. Winkler (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Research), Methods and Analyses for Determining Quality


Abstract

In a possibly ideal world, records in a database would be complete and would contain fields having values that correspond to an underlying reality. An individual's name, address and date-of-birth would be present without typographical error. An income field might be a reasonably close approximation of a 'true income' and would not be missing. A list of customers would be complete, unduplicated and current. In this ideal world, a database could be used for several purposes and would be considered to have high quality. A set of databases might be linked using name, address, and other weakly identifying information. In this paper, we describe situations where properly chosen metrics may indicate that data quality is not sufficiently high for monitoring processes, for modeling, and for data mining. Some of the metrics are supplementary to those in the quality literature or have rarely been used. Additionally, we describe generalized methods and software tools that allow a skilled individual to perform massive clean-up of files in some situations. The clean-up, while possibly sub-optimal in recreating 'truth,' can replace exceptionally large amounts of clerical review and allow many uses of the 'cleaned' files.


©2006 Association for Computing Machinery