Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2005
PODS 2005
SIGMOD-RECOR
CIDR 2005
CIKM 2005
COMAD 2005
CVDB 2005
DaMoN 2005
Data Enginee
DEBS05
DMSN 2005
DOLAP 2005
GIR 2005
GIS 2005
Hypertext 20
ICDE 2005
ICDM 2005
IHIS 2005
IQIS 2005
JCDL 2005
KRAS 2005
MDM 2005
MIR 2005
MobiDE 2005
P2PIR 2005
RIDE 2005
SBBD 2005
SIGIR 2005
SIGIR-FORUM
SIGKDD 2005
SIGKDD-EXP
SSDBM 2005
TIME 2005
TKDE 2005
<<< = TKDE'05 Pape>>>
TODS 2005
VLDB 2005
VLDBJ 2005
WebDB 2005
WIDM 2005

Maximum weighted likelihood via rival penalized EM for density mixture clustering with automatic model selection


Yiu-ming Cheung

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to June 2005, Volume 17, Issue 6


Abstract

Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm (A.P. Dempster et al., 1977) has been extensively used in density mixture clustering problems, but it is unable to-perform model selection automatically. This paper, therefore, proposes to learn the model parameters via maximizing a weighted likelihood. Under a specific weight design, we give out a rival penalized expectation-maximization (RPEM) algorithm, which makes the components in a density mixture compete each other at each time step. Not only are the associated parameters of the winner updated to adapt to an input, but also all rivals' parameters are penalized with the strength proportional to the corresponding posterior density probabilities. Compared to the EM algorithm (A.P. Dempster et al., 1977), the RPEM is able to fade out the redundant densities from a density mixture during the learning process. Hence, it can automatically select an appropriate number of densities in density mixture clustering. We experimentally demonstrate its outstanding performance on Gaussian mixtures and color image segmentation problem. Moreover, a simplified version of RPEM generalizes our recently proposed RPCCL algorithm (Y.M. Cheung, 2002) so that it is applicable to elliptical clusters as well with any input proportion. Compared to the existing heuristic RPCL (L. Xu et al., 1993) and its variants, this generalized RPCCL (G-RPCCL) circumvents the difficult preselection of the so-called delearning rate. Additionally, a special setting of the G-RPCCL not only degenerates to RPCL and its Type A variant, but also gives a guidance to choose an appropriate delearning rate for them. Subsequently, we propose a stochastic version of RPCL and its type A variant, respectively, in which the difficult selection problem of delearning rate has been novelly circumvented. The experiments show the promising results of this stochastic implementation.


©2006 Association for Computing Machinery