Welcome to D
SIGMOD 2005
PODS 2005
SIGMOD-RECOR
CIDR 2005
CIKM 2005
COMAD 2005
CVDB 2005
DaMoN 2005
Data Enginee
DEBS05
DMSN 2005
DOLAP 2005
GIR 2005
GIS 2005
Hypertext 20
ICDE 2005
ICDM 2005
IHIS 2005
IQIS 2005
JCDL 2005
KRAS 2005
MDM 2005
MIR 2005
MobiDE 2005
P2PIR 2005
RIDE 2005
SBBD 2005
SIGIR 2005
SIGIR-FORUM
SIGKDD 2005
SIGKDD-EXP
<<< = SIGKDD-EXP P>>>
SSDBM 2005
TIME 2005
TKDE 2005
TODS 2005
VLDB 2005
VLDBJ 2005
WebDB 2005
WIDM 2005

Sampling Algorithms for Pure Network Topologies


Edoardo M. Airoldi and Kathleen M. Carley

  View Paper (PDF)  

Return to December 2005, Volume 7, Issue 2


Abstract

In a time of information glut, observations about complex systems and phenomena of interest are available in several applications areas, such as biology and text. As a conse- quence, scientists have started searching for patterns that involve interactions among the ob jects of analysis, to the effect that research on models and algorithms for network analysis has become a central theme for knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD). The intuitions behind the plethora of approaches rely upon few basic types of networks, identi- fied by specific local and global topological properties, which we term "pure" topology types. In this paper, (1) we survey pure topology types along with existing sampling algorithms that generate them, (2) we in- troduce novel algorithms that enhance the diversity of sam- ples, and address the case of cellular topologies, (3) we per- form statistical studies of the stability of the properties of pure types to alternative generative algorithms, and a joint study of the separability of pure types, in terms of their em- bedding in a space of metrics for network analysis, widely adopted in the social and physical sciences. We conclude with a word of caution to the practitioners, who sample pure topology types to assess the "statistical signifi- cance" of their findings, e.g., the p-value of the clustering co- efficient is sensitive to the sampling algorithm used. We find that different pure types share similar topological properties. Further, real world networks hardly present the variability profile of a single pure type. We suggest the assumption of "mixtures of types" as an alternative starting point for developing models and algorithms for network analysis.


©2006 Association for Computing Machinery